Downfall of meadow plants communities on the Left Bank Forest-Steppe Boundary in Ukraine

  • L. D. Orlova Poltava Korolenko National Pedagogical University
Keywords: downfall, storage, meadow plant communities, forest-steppe boundary of the Left Bank of Ukraine

Abstract

The research was carried out on the different types of grassland plant communities on the left-bank forest boundary in Ukraine. It was established that the supplies of downfall on the  floodplaine meadows were within 37,3–1973,7 g/m2, upland medows – 21,8–627,3 g/m2, lowland medows – 70,0–1363,0 g/m2. The results of the research made it possible to identify three groups of indicators on the amount of downfalls. The first group consists of the areas with such amount of dawnfall as – 80.0 g/m2, the second one – 80,0–160,0 g/m2, and the third one – more than 160.0 g/m2. The change rate which depends on the part of the floodplain medows was considered. In the riverine area it was defined in the range of 31,8–663,6 g/m2, in the central area – 41,8–1973,7 g/m2, in the pre-terrace area – 37,3–1654,6 g/m2. The difference among minimal parameters is small but among maximum is significant. It is generally accepted that the results of the research are mainly supported by specific differences of floristic composition. The larger number of indicators (within the second group) are in the central parts of the investigated floodplains and rivers. In the central areas in general, there was a higher level of dry matter content. Combined with the increasing amount of downfall, to some extent, it is considered to be an indicator of higher crop level in this area. It was figured out that in some areas the upland meadows have got different number of the investigated indicators. The most important factors for this issue are the lower parts of the area but the minimum are the tops of the slopes. The difference can be quite significant. The comparison between the formation of downfall in the upland grasslands and the steppe area showed a certain regularity. In steppe areas the accumulation of the indicator was nearly one third less than the average one in the investigated meadows. The number of dry matter varied in the range of 31,8–95,7 %. The lower indicators as well as the upper ones differed in general not more than 10,0 %. In general the amount of dry matter content was the highest on the top of the slopes ant the lowest amount was on the bottom. In the overwhelming majority of surveyed lowland there was an increasing level of accumulation in the second and third groups.The comparison of the results about the accumulation of the downfall in the lowland meadows in the studied forest-steppe and steppe regions of Ukraine, which borders on the South, showed that its accumulation in the steppe regions was much less comparatively to the surveyed regions. Dry matter content of the downfall of this grassland areas was in the range of  31,9–94,4 %. We found that the energy storage of downfall meadow plant communities of the region is in the range of 0,4 × 106–37,1 × 106 Dzh/m2. Each type of medows has its own specific characteristics of the index and indicators. Thus, energy storage on the floodplaine was within 0,6 × 106–37,1 × 106 Dzh/m2, upland 0,4 × 106–12,1 × 106 Dzh/m2, lowland meadows – 1,3 × 106–25,7 × 106 Dzh/m2. Indicators of lowland meadows occupy an intermediate position between floodplain and upland areas. The comparison of borderline indicators allows us to see that they vary greatly both upper and lower. Minimal indicators are differe for 0,2 × 106–0,7 × 106 Dzh/m2 and maximum 7,3 × 106–16,1 × 106 Dzh /m2. The reduction of economic activity, in particular, the implementation of conservation as for all investigated meadow plant communities of the region leads to increasing amount of downfall in average. Weather conditions influences greatly the accumulation of the downfall. The analysis of climat map which was presented, shows us more favourable weather conditions during particular years. That is why the maximum storage of downfall was  observed during this period.

References

Bazylevych, N. I., Rodin, L. E., 1964. Tipy biolohicheskoho kruhovorota zolnikh elementov i azota v osnovnykh prirodnykh zonakh Severnoho polushariia [Types of biological cycle of cinder elements and nitrogen in the areas of major natural areas of the Northern Hemisphere]. Genesis, soil classification and cartography USSR. Moscow. 134–145 (in Russian).
Belgard, A. L., 1950. Lesnaia rastitelnost yuho-vostoka USSR [Forest vegetation of the south-eastern part of the USSR]. Kiev University Press, Kiev (in Russian).
Belgard, A. L., 1971. Stepnoe lesovedenie [Steppe and forest study]. Forest Industries, Moscow (in Russian).
Belova, N. A., Travleev, A. P., 1999. Estestvennye lesa i stepnye pochvy [Natural the forest and steppe soil]. Dnepropetrovsk University Press, Dnepropetrovsk (in Russian).
Biolohicheskaia produktivnost travianyh ekosistem [Biological productivity of grass ecosystems. Geographic regularity and environmental features], 1988. Nauka, Sib. Department, Novosibirsk (in Russian).
Biolohichna produktyvnist luchnykh bioheotsenoziv subalpiiskoho poiasu Karpat [Biological productivity of meadow biocenosis in the subAlps zone of the Carpathians], 1974. Ed. K. A. Malinowski. Naukova dumka, Kiev (in Ukrainian).
Didukh, J. P., 2005. Ekoloho-enerhetychni aspekty u spivvidnoshenni lisovykh i stepovykh ecosystem [Environmental and energy aspects in the ratio of forest and grassland ecosystems]. Ukrainian Botanical Magazine. 62(4), 445–467 (in Ukrainian).
Dospehov, B. A., 1979. Metodika polevoho opyta (S osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezultatov issledovaniia) [Methodology of the field Experience (On the basic statistic data processing of the results of the study)]. Kolos, Moscow (in Russian).
Druzyna, V. D., 1977. Dinamika zolnikh elementov i azota v luhovykh bioheotsenozakh (na primere melkozlakovo-raznotravnykh soobshchestv) [Dynamics of the cinder elements and nitrogen in medows Biogeocenoses (for Example cernel and herb types)]. The dissertation abstracts on competition of a scientific degree of cand. biol. sci.: special 03.00.05 Botany. Leningrad (in Russian).
Kompiuterni metody v silskomu hospodarstvi ta biolohii [Computer methods in agriculture and biology], 2000. University Book, Sumi (in Russian).
Odum, J., 1975. Osnovy ekolohii [Fundamentals of Ecology]. Mir, Moscow (in Russian).
Produktivnost luhovyh soobshchestv [Productivity of meadow units], 1978. Ed. V. M. Ponyatkovskaya. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian).
Rodin, L. E., 1965. Dinamika orhanicheskoho veshchestva i biolohicheskij kruhovorot v osnovnykh tipakh rastitelnosti [Dynamic of organic substance and biological cycle of major vegetation types]. Nauka, Moscow, Leningrad (in Russian).
Rodin, L. E., Remezov, N. P., 1967. Metodicheskie ukazaniia k izucheniiu dinamiki i biolohicheskoho kruhovorota v fitotsenozakh [Methodological instruction as for the research of the dynamics and biological cycle in phytocoenosis]. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian).
Ronhynskaya, A. V., 1988. Dinamicheskie protsessy v luhovykh fitotsenozakh (na primere luhov Salairskoho kriazha) [Dynamic processes in medow phytocoenosis (for Example Salayrskiy meadow ridge]. Nauka, Novosibirsk (in Russian).
Semenova-Tian-Shanskaya, A. M., 1977. Nakoplenie i rol podstilki v travianykh soobshchestvakh [Accumulation and role of underlay of grass unit family]. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian).
Semenov-Tian-Shanskaya, A. M., 1960. Dinamika nakopleniia i razlozheniia mertvyh rastitelnikh ostatkov v luhovo-stepnykh i luhovikh tsenozakh [Dynamics of Accumulation and decomposition of vegetable remnants in meadow and steppe coenoses]. Botan . Journal. 45(9), 1342–1350 (in Russian).
Shuynshalyev, T. T., 1981. Biolohicheskij kruhovorot enerhii, zolnikh elementov i azota v osnovnykh assotsiatsiiakh pojmennykh luhov r. Ural [Biological cycle of energy, cinder elements and nitrogen in the association of major meadows of the Ural river]. The dissertation abstract on competition of a scientific degree of cand. biol. sci. Alma-Ata (in Russian).
Sukhodolnij luh kak bioheotsenoz [Dry medow lowlands as biogeoceonoses], 1978. Ed. T. A. Ra-botnov. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Travleev, A. P., Belova, N. A., 2004. Tipolohiia stepnyh lesov i lesnoe pochvoobrazovanie (k 50-letiiu Kompleksnoj ekspeditsii DNU) [Typology of forest steppe zones and soil formation (to 50 anniversary of Integrated expedition DNU)]. Problems of Forestry and forest steppe land reclamation. 8, 4–13 (in Russian).
Tsaryk, I. V., 1977. Nakoplenie i razlozhenie podstilki v bioheotsenozakh subalpijskoho poiasa Karpat [Accumulation and decomposition of underlayer in Biogeoceonoses in subalpian belt of the Carpathians]. The dissertation abstract on competition of a scientific degree of cand. biol. sci.: special 03.00.16 Biogenoceology and ecology. Dnepropetrovsk (in Ukrainian).
Tsvetkova, N. N., 1992. Osobennosti mihratsii orhano-mineralnykh veshchestv i mikroelementov v lesnykh bioheotsenozakh stepnoj Ukrainy [Features of migration of mineral organic substances and microelements in forest biogeoceonoses of steppe area in Ukraine]. Dnepropetrovsk (in Russian).
Tsvetkova, N. N., Jacuba, M. S., 2008. Biokruhoobih rechovyn u bioheotsenosakh Prysamaria Dniprovskoho [Biocycle of substances in biogeoceonoses of Prysamar'ya Dnieper region]. Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukrainian).
Tytlyanova, A. A., 1971. Izuchenie biolohicheskoho kruhovorota v bioheotsenozakh [The study of biological cycle in biogeoceonoses]. Nauka, Novosibirsk (in Russian).
Walter, H., 1964. Die Vegetation der Endre. In oko-physiologischer Betrachtung. Fischer, Jena. Dd 1, 592 s.
Published
2013-04-11
How to Cite
Orlova, L. D. (2013). Downfall of meadow plants communities on the Left Bank Forest-Steppe Boundary in Ukraine. Ecology and Noospherology, 25(1-2), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.15421/031403